Submissions

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

Original Research Articles are the cornerstone of scholarly output in Scientia Humanae. The primary goal of these articles is to present new findings and significant contributions to the fields of social sciences and humanities. These papers should provide fresh insights, supported by robust data and rigorous analyses, and must advance the existing knowledge in the chosen area of study significantly.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of an Original Research Article in Scientia Humanae includes:

• Title: Clear and concise, reflecting the content of the article.
• Abstract: A summary of up to 250 words outlining the main objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
• Keywords: 3-5 keywords that will assist in the indexing and retrieval of the article.
• Introduction: Contextualization of the study, brief review of relevant literature, and statement of the research problem.
• Methods: Detailed description of the study design, procedures, materials, and analysis methods used.
• Results: Clear presentation of collected data, accompanied by tables, graphs, and figures as necessary.
• Discussion: Interpretation of results, connection with existing literature, practical and theoretical implications, and limitations of the study.
• Conclusions: Summary of findings and their implications.
• Acknowledgments: (optional) Recognition of financial, technical, or academic support.
• References: Complete list of sources cited in the article, formatted according to the citation style adopted by the journal.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Original Research Articles should ideally contain between 3,000 to 6,000 words, including the abstract, references, tables, and footnotes. This range allows for a detailed discussion without being overly verbose

REVIEW ARTICLES

Review Articles in Scientia Humanae aim to synthesize existing research, providing comprehensive overviews of significant topics within the social sciences and humanities. The primary goal is to evaluate and summarize the current state of research on a specific issue, identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature, and suggest directions for future research. These articles help contextualize findings within broader scholarly debates and offer readers critical insights into the field.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The structure of a Review Article typically includes:

• Title: Clear and reflective of the theme of the review.
• Abstract: A concise summary of the article’s content, including the main topics covered, conclusions drawn, and the significance of the review.
• Introduction: Introduction to the topic, outlining its importance and the objectives of the review.
• Methodology: Description of the methods used to select, retrieve, and analyze the literature, including databases searched, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and the analytical framework.
• Body: Organized thematically or chronologically, discussing the major works and findings in the field, highlighting significant theories, methodologies, and results.
• Discussion: Critical analysis of the literature, noting inconsistencies, debating controversies, and synthesizing key conclusions. Discussion of the implications of findings for future research and practice.
• Conclusions: Summarization of the insights gained from the review, emphasizing how it advances understanding in the field.
• References: Comprehensive list of all works cited, adhering to the journal’s citation style.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Review Articles should generally range from 3,000 to 6,000 words, depending on the complexity and breadth of the topic. This allows for a thorough exploration of the literature while maintaining focus and coherence.

POLICY ANALYSIS PAPERS

olicy Analysis Papers in Scientia Humanae are dedicated to evaluating, critiquing, and enhancing understanding of public policies, programs, and broader regulatory frameworks within the context of social sciences and humanities. These articles aim to bridge the gap between empirical research and policy implementation by providing insightful analyses that can inform policymakers, stakeholders, and the broader public about the effectiveness, implications, and potential improvements of specific policies.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Policy Analysis Paper includes:

• Title: Should clearly indicate the focus of the policy analysis.
• Abstract: A concise summary outlining the policy issue, methods of analysis, key findings, and recommendations.
• Introduction: Sets the context for the policy analysis, defines the policy issue, and states the objectives of the paper.
• Policy Context: Provides background on the policy's development, current status, and its role within the larger regulatory or governmental framework.
• Methods: Describes the analytical techniques and data sources used to evaluate the policy. This might include quantitative methods, qualitative assessments, or a mixed-methods approach.
• Analysis: Detailed examination of the policy’s outcomes, effectiveness, and any unintended consequences. This section should critically assess both the successes and shortcomings of the policy.
• Discussion: Interprets the findings in relation to existing research and theory, discusses implications for future policy, and considers alternative approaches.
• Recommendations: Offers well-founded suggestions for policy modification, continuation, or revocation based on the analysis.
• Conclusion: Summarizes the main points and reinforces the importance of the findings and recommendations.
• References: Comprehensive list of all sources cited, formatted according to the journal’s guidelines.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Policy Analysis Papers should typically range from 2,500 to 4,000 words. This allows authors to provide a thorough analysis while maintaining focus and clarity.

CASE STUDIES

ase Studies in Scientia Humanae serve to provide detailed, contextual examinations of specific instances that highlight broader trends, principles, or phenomena within the fields of social sciences and humanities. The primary goal is to offer insights that are not only profound and situationally specific but also generalize to broader theoretical or practical implications. These contributions are especially valuable for revealing the complexity of real-world scenarios and for testing theoretical models in situational contexts.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Case Study includes:

• Title: Concise and indicative of the case’s focus.
• Abstract: A brief summary that outlines the case’s significance, methodology, main findings, and conclusions.
• Introduction: Introduces the case, outlines its relevance to broader issues, and states the objectives of the study.
• Background: Provides context necessary to understand the case, including historical, socio-economic, or cultural information.
• Case Description: A detailed presentation of the case itself, including key events, stakeholders, decisions, and outcomes.
• Methodological Approach: Explains the methods used to gather data (e.g., interviews, document analysis, observation) and the rationale for using a case study approach.
• Analysis: In-depth analysis of the case, linking empirical findings to theoretical frameworks. Discusses how the case contributes to understanding the broader phenomena or theory.
• Discussion: Interprets the implications of the case findings for theory and practice, identifies lessons learned, and suggests areas for further research.
• Conclusions: Summarizes the insights gained from the case study and underscores their importance to the field.
• References: Lists all sources cited, following the journal’s citation guidelines.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Case Studies should generally be between 2,500 and 4,000 words, providing sufficient detail to understand the complexities of the case while maintaining concise and focused narrative.

METHODOLOGICAL PAPERS

Methodological Papers in Scientia Humanae are critical for advancing research techniques and tools within the social sciences and humanities. These articles aim to introduce new methodologies or significantly improve upon existing ones, offering detailed insights into their application, benefits, and limitations. The goal is to provide researchers with robust tools that can enhance the accuracy and depth of their analyses, potentially opening new avenues for inquiry and increasing the replicability of research findings.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Methodological Paper includes:

• Title: Should be precise and reflect the focus of the methodological innovation or critique.
• Abstract: A concise overview that summarizes the methodology, its novel aspects, applications, and potential impact on the field.
• Introduction: Sets the stage for the paper by outlining the need for the new or improved methodology and its relevance to current research challenges.
• Methodological Development: Describes in detail the development of the methodology, including theoretical underpinnings, step-by-step processes, and any computational or statistical tools used.
• Validation: Provides evidence of the methodology’s effectiveness through case studies, experiments, or simulations. This section should also discuss the reliability and validity of the method.
• Comparison with Existing Methods: Offers a comparative analysis of the new methodology against current methods, highlighting advantages and addressing any limitations.
• Applications: Discusses potential applications of the methodology across various research topics and settings within the social sciences and humanities.
• Discussion: Explores the implications of the methodology for future research, including how it can address existing gaps or problems.
• Conclusions: Summarizes the contributions of the methodology to the field and suggests directions for further development.
• References: Includes a comprehensive list of citations, adhering to the journal’s guidelines.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Methodological Papers should ideally range from 2,500 to 4,000 words, allowing enough space to thoroughly discuss the methodology and its implications.

Quality Standards Desired for This Type of Work:

• Innovativeness: The methodology should offer a novel approach or significant improvements over existing methods.
• Rigor: The development and validation of the methodology should be rigorously documented and scientifically sound.
• Clarity: The description of the methodology should be clear and detailed enough that other researchers can replicate it.
• Impact: The paper should demonstrate how the methodology can impact research practices and outcomes in the field.
• Utility: The methodology should have broad applicability or be particularly useful for certain types of research questions or contexts.
• Ethical Considerations: The methodology should adhere to ethical standards, particularly when involving human subjects.

Methodological Papers play a pivotal role in Scientia Humanae by equipping the research community with innovative tools that promote more effective and rigorous investigation, thereby contributing significantly to the advancement of social sciences and humanities.

PRACTICIONER´ S INSIGHTS

Practitioner's Insights in Scientia Humanae aim to bridge the gap between academic research and practical application in the social sciences and humanities. These articles provide a platform for professionals in various fields—such as education, social work, psychology, and community planning—to share their experiences, challenges, and solutions that arise in the implementation of theories and research findings in real-world settings. The goal is to enrich the academic discourse with practical knowledge that can inform better research and more effective interventions.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Practitioner's Insight article includes:

• Title: Clearly reflects the focus of the practical insights being shared.
• Abstract: A brief overview that summarizes the context, the insights shared, and the practical implications of the experiences discussed.
• Introduction: Introduces the practitioner’s background, the relevance of their work to the broader field, and the objectives of the article.
• Context and Challenges: Describes the specific context in which the practitioner operates, including any significant challenges or barriers encountered.
• Insights and Solutions: Details the practical insights gained through the application of research or theories, the strategies developed to address challenges, and the outcomes achieved.
• Theoretical Connections: Links practical experiences back to academic theories or research, highlighting how real-world application can contribute to or challenge academic understanding.
• Implications for Practice and Research: Discusses how the insights can influence practice in the field and suggest areas where further academic research could be beneficial.
• Conclusions: Summarizes the key insights and their implications for both practitioners and researchers.
• References: A list of academic and other sources cited, formatted according to the journal’s guidelines.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Practitioner's Insights should typically range from 3,000 to 5,000 words, allowing for a detailed yet concise presentation of practical experiences.

DATA PAPERS

 Data Papers in Scientia Humanae are specialized articles focused on the presentation and description of datasets that have been collected as part of research processes in the social sciences and humanities. These papers aim to make significant datasets available to the wider academic community, facilitating transparency, reproducibility, and extended analysis by other researchers. The primary goal is to provide a detailed account of the dataset, its potential applications, and the methodology used to gather the data.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Data Paper includes:

• Title: Should clearly indicate the nature of the data and its thematic or geographical focus.
• Abstract: A concise summary that outlines the content and significance of the dataset, as well as its potential applications.
• Introduction: Provides background on the research question that led to the data collection and its importance within the field.
• Methodology: Describes the methods used to collect the data, including design, instruments, sampling, and any ethical considerations.
• Data Description: Offers a comprehensive description of the data set, including types of data collected, data format, data structure, and any limitations or biases in the data.
• Quality Control: Details the steps taken to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data.
• Usage Notes: Suggests potential uses for the data, discusses any tools needed to analyze the data, and provides examples of possible research questions or projects that could be supported by the dataset.
• Access and Licensing: Provides information on how the data can be accessed, any restrictions on its use, and licensing details.
• Citation Details: Specifies how the data and the data paper should be cited by other researchers.
• References: Lists any references to publications that use or are used by the dataset, formatted according to the journal’s guidelines.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Data Papers should typically range from 2,000 to 4,000 words, depending on the complexity and scope of the dataset described.

VISUAL ESSAYS

Visual Essays in Scientia Humanae provide a unique medium for conveying complex ideas, narratives, and research findings through visual formats. These essays combine the power of imagery, graphic design, video, and other visual media with scholarly insight to engage more profoundly with topics relevant to the social sciences and humanities. The primary goal is to offer an alternative, accessible, and impactful way of understanding and discussing scholarly content that might be less effectively communicated through traditional text-based articles.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of a Visual Essay includes:

• Title: Captures the essence of the visual narrative.
• Abstract: A brief summary that outlines the thematic focus and the approach of the visual essay.
• Introduction: Provides context for the visual essay, including its relevance, objectives, and the main themes addressed.
• Visual Narrative: A sequence of visuals (e.g., photographs, diagrams, infographics, video clips) that tell a story or articulate a complex argument or research finding.
• Textual Components: Accompanying text that provides analysis, commentary, or narrative to complement the visuals. This may include captions, brief passages of text between images, or a concluding reflection.
• Discussion: Analyzes the implications of the visual argument for the field, discussing how the visual approach enhances understanding of the topic.
• Conclusion: Summarizes the key messages conveyed in the essay and reflects on the impact or potential applications of the visual approach.
• References: Lists all scholarly and creative sources cited or used in the creation of the visual essay, adhering to the journal’s citation style.

Suggested Word or Character Count: While primarily visual, accompanying texts should typically range between 1,000 to 3,000 words, depending on the complexity and depth of the visual content presented.

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

Educational Resources in Scientia Humanae are designed to support teaching and learning in the social sciences and humanities. This section aims to provide educators, students, and the general public with innovative materials that can be directly applied in educational settings or used for self-study. These contributions focus on creating and sharing high-quality, accessible educational content such as lesson plans, syllabi, educational games, interactive modules, and comprehensive guides on specific topics.

Standardized Detailed Structure: The typical structure of an Educational Resource contribution includes:

• Title: Clearly indicates the educational focus and audience of the resource.
• Abstract: A brief overview that summarizes the purpose, content, and educational value of the resource.
• Introduction: Explains the background and need for the educational resource, including its relevance to current educational practices or gaps in available materials.
• Content Description: Detailed explanation of the resource, including its objectives, target audience, and how it is to be used. This section should provide a thorough breakdown of the components of the resource.
• Implementation Guidelines: Offers detailed instructions on how to implement the resource in an educational setting, including any necessary materials, technological requirements, and step-by-step guides for educators.
• Pedagogical Basis: Discusses the educational theories or pedagogical strategies upon which the resource is based, ensuring that its educational effectiveness is grounded in proven practices.
• Evaluation and Feedback: Provides methods for assessing the effectiveness of the resource in achieving its educational goals, along with any feedback received from preliminary testing or pilot studies.
• Accessibility and Adaptation: Details on how the resource can be adapted to different educational contexts, levels, or diverse student needs, including modifications for accessibility.
• Conclusion: Summarizes the potential impact of the resource on teaching and learning and reflects on future developments or improvements.
• References: Lists all scholarly and pedagogical sources cited in the creation of the educational resource, formatted according to the journal’s citation style.

Suggested Word or Character Count: Educational Resources should typically range from 2,000 to 5,000 words, allowing for comprehensive coverage while maintaining clarity and conciseness.

Educational Resources in Scientia Humanae are intended to enrich the educational landscape by providing tools that foster an innovative and effective learning experience. These contributions are valuable assets for educators looking to enhance engagement and deepen understanding among students in diverse educational settings.